The correlation between colocation and PUE TCO

Examining the Connection Colocation TCO

 

When considering a colocation facility that is new, one can handle PUE danger by selecting and in the exact same climate as an existing facility that has a strong average PUE. (Photo: Rich Miller)

Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales, tim Mirick for Sabey Data Centers, explores the Power Utilization Efficiency inside the data centre sector of Green Grid. Greater facility efficacy and data center PUE are tied to lower colocation TCO colocation data center.

 

 

colocation data center

Data centre pue Sabey Data Centers

Been the metric for data center. This ratio is determined by dividing the amount of energy entering a centre. The nearer a centre gets to a 1:1 ratio, the greater, though the best data centers are above 1. The most efficient centre at Sabey’s Quincy, Washington campus, for instance, has an average annual PUE of 1.13, which is deemed exceptional.

The purpose of PUE would be to show management how much power is Utilized by equipment like air handlers and light. So for instance, a PUE of 1.13 indicates that, for each 1 kilowatt of IT energy utilized, the centre itself absorbs 0.13 kilowatts on heating, light and other non-IT functions.

 

 

 

PUE is a particularly crucial metric in determining the total Cost for leasing a colocation data center of ownership. In addition a colocation tenant pays for the electricity required to support their IT infrastructure together with the overhead related to the PUE. Greater facility efficacy consequently equates to lower total cost of ownership (TCO).

 

Take the instance of heating and air handling. Keeping Servers trendy is a expensive endeavor, one that leads to a PUE. Companies such as Facebook have tried to transfer data centers to bypass the cost of cooling. Microsoft is experimenting with information centers that are submarine.

 

For a data centre provider Or the Arctic Circle. Stillthey need to work hard to keep costs down for their clients, which they could do through methods such as hot-aisle containment, a form of passive airflow which relies on heat climbing into ceiling return plenums so that it may be cycled back into air conditioners with minimal added energy use from fans.

 

When considering a colocation center, an Individual can manage PUE risk by choosing a data center that has been built with the same design and in the exact same climate as an present facility which has a strong average PUE.

 

Bring about a colocation facility’s PUE comprise the type of equipment used by the supplier, cooling method, control systems utilized by the operations staff, lighting systems, and also the gear and setup methods (e.g. blanking plates) from the customer.

 

Key considerations for assessing PUE assurances

 

It’s important for customers to while assessing choices First know the different ways which PUE might be represented:

 

Target PUE: This can be target PUE and, of the colocation facility It does not necessarily reflect operational reality.

 

Theoretical PUE: A achievable PUE under perfect Circumstances, it may also be quite a snapshot through a PUE point, but it isn’t reflective of what is really happening on average in the data center.

 

Design PUE: This is a facility’s PUE that is Under construction.

 

Typical PUE: The metric with potential Dependable, annual PUE or average monthly is just what it sounds like. It provides the average, real PUE for an extended time period. However, it’s important to consider the supplier is currently measuring in order to compute these averages. It is fairly simple to”fudge the numbers” by selectively sampling PUE through its known low points.

 

Peak PUE: Additionally useful PUE identifies PUE under the state — for example.

 

It’s also worth exploring Doesn’t contain how they’re measuring to ensure that they aren’t controlling their numbers and in PUE. By way of example, are they factoring in energy dropped in cabling? Closely to the IT gear are they measuring the power consumption of a server? Measuring from a host will yield a higher ingestion reading.

 

Be mindful of those and other factors as you check your Choices.

 

Performance boils down to credibility

 

An Present facility with an Established PUE track record will Most likely come closest to meeting expectations. There’s some risk involved when assessing new facilities a new layout or in a new climate, since you’ll primarily assess efficacy on a layout PUE, a PUE or a typical pulled from a small sample size.

 

When considering a colocation facility that is new, one can handle PUE danger by choosing a data centre that is being built with the identical design and in precisely the same climate as an present facility that has a strong average PUE.

 

In the end of the day, the Best and best way to Guarantee a very low TCO is carefully assessing a provider’s PUE track record around All places and facilities.